Edd King v. National General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20244:15-cv-00313California15,195 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDD KING, et al., Case No. 15-cv-00313-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING

NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Edd King, Dierdre King and Sheila Lee bring this putative class action on behalf of themselves and similarly situated qualified good drivers. They allege that Defendants1 unlawfully overcharged them for auto insurance premiums in violation of California Insurance Code (“CIC”) section 1861.16(b). That statute provides that: “An agent or representative representing one or more insurers having common ownership or operating in California under common management or control shall offer, and the insurer shall sell, a good driver discount policy to a good driver from an insurer within that common ownership, management, or control group, which offers the lowest rates for that coverage.” After reviewing the parties’ Rule 23 briefing, the court determined that it needed to rule on …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.