Vitale

Vitale v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20245:23-cv-06019California5,667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 FRANCESCO VITALE, et al., Case No. 5:23-cv-06019-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL LEAVE TO AMEND ASSOCIATION, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 37, 44, 45] Defendants. 12 Before the Court are Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) and WT Capital Lender Services’ (“WT Capital”) motions to dismiss pro se Plaintiffs Francesco “Frank” Vitale and Frances Vitale’s (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint. ECF Nos. 37 (“Wells Fargo Mot.”), 45 (“WT Capital Mot.”). Defendants Browning Law Group and Yvonne Ramirez- Browning join in Wells Fargo’s motion. ECF No. 44 (“Joinder Mot.”). Plaintiffs filed an opposition to Wells Fargo’s motion. ECF No. 48 (“Opp.”). Because the opposition was filed after the deadline for Plaintiffs’ response to Wells Fargo’s motion and after both Wells Fargo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.