Floyd

Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Correction

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20243:22-cv-00750California4,520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

19 On this motion for summary judgment, the Court considers the parties’ admissible 20 evidence and resolves all factual disputes against the moving party. See Orr v. Bank of 21 Am., NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 772–73 (9th Cir. 2002). The Court cannot consider 22 unauthenticated or inadmissible evidence, even for the purpose of drawing inferences from 23 that evidence. Id. at 773. 24 A. Events at Santa Clara County Main Jail 25 San Jose Police Department officers arrested Floyd on the evening of August 18, 26 2021, and brought him to the Santa Clara County Main Jail. Third Am. Compl. at 8. 27 Officers booked Floyd into the Main Jail at 11:45 p.m. Dundic Decl. (dkt. 106-8) ¶ 4. Floyd names the following officers from the Main Jail as Defendants: Dung Tran, Robert Silos, Jeremy Hiles, Saul Agustin, Charles Stokes, III, Ryan Reyes, and Sergeant Vorpahl. Third Am. Compl. at 4, 7. For most of the time that Floyd spent at the Main Jail, he was secured to a chair in the intake lobby. Id. ¶ 5; see generally Floyd Exhibits (dkt. 108-3), Ex. V1 (intake lobby camera footage), Ex. V2 (intake lobby camera footage). Officers escorted Floyd to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.