Adams

Adams v. Solano State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20245:24-cv-06704California407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY D. ADAMS,

Case No. 24-cv-06704 EJD (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER OF TRANSER

v.

14 SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Solano State Prison (“SSP”), filed a pro se civil rights complaint against SSP staff regarding the calculation of good time credits and his “EPRD” (earliest possible release date). Dkt. No. 1 at 3, 8. Plaintiff wants his good time credits properly calculated and damages for serving “excessive time.” Id. at 3. Plaintiff also asserts violations of his rights to equal protection, due process, and constitutionally adequate medical care against SSP staff. Id. at 7-11 First of all, challenges to the lawfulness of confinement or to particulars affecting its duration are the province of habeas corpus.’” Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573, 579 (2006) (quoting Muhammad v. Close, 540 U.S. 749, 750 (2004)). Plaintiff’s claim challenging the duration of his confinement must therefore be raised in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.