Akers
Akers v. Labson-Freeman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, Case No. 23-cv-04221-JSC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERTION, REVOKING
v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, AND DISMISSING CASE
BETH LABSON-FREEMAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants.
INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a federal prisoner at the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Georgia (“USP Marion”), who is proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights case. He was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) as well as leave to amend. (ECF Nos. 7, 8.) Thereafter, the Court ordered Plaintiff “to either (1) pay the filing fee, or (2) show cause why leave to proceed IFP should not be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),” and cautioned him that “[h]is failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice to re-filing in a new action in which he pays the filing fee.” (ECF No. 23 (“OSC”) at 1:16-19.) Now before…