Ebony Byrd v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20243:24-cv-01639California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EBONY BYRD, Case No. 24-cv-01639-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY

STAY

M.A.C. COSMETICS INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.’s (“M.A.C.”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ebony Byrd’s (“Byrd”) complaint, or alternatively, to stay the action. This Order assumes familiarity with the facts and claims of this case as well as those of Ignacio Maciel et al. v. M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc., No. 3:23-CV-3718-AMO (“Maciel”). The motion is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for October 21, 2024, is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS M.A.C.’s motion for a discretionary stay for the following reasons. While M.A.C. primarily argues for this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.