Ramirez

Ramirez v. Trusper, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20245:24-cv-02012California5,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ELIA RAMIREZ, Case No. 5:24-cv-02012-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION

v.

TRUSPER, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendant.

Plaintiff, Elia Ramirez (“Ramirez”), on behalf of herself and a class of other similarly situated individuals, brings claims against Defendant, a telehealth company known as Trusper, Inc., d/b/a Musely (“Musely”), alleging that Musley embedded surveillance software known as “Facebook Pixel” into its website that allowed Meta Platforms, Inc., to intercept patients’ personally identifiable and protected health information in violation of various California privacy laws. Compl., ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Musely Participant Agreement (“Participation Agreement”). Mot., ECF No. 14. This motion is fully briefed. Opp’n, ECF No. 22; Reply, ECF No. 23. Having carefully reviewed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.