Stine

Implicit Conversions, Inc. v. Stine

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20243:24-cv-03744California3,831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IMPLICIT CONVERSIONS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-03744-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

JACOB STINE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 39 Defendants.

12 After Implicit Conversions, Inc. (“Implicit”) filed suit against its former employees Jacob Stine (“Stine”) and Juanita Traver Stine (“Traver Stine”), alleging that they committed computer fraud against the company and violated their contracts, Stine and Traver Stine (who are married) filed counterclaims, alleging that Implicit and its Chief Executive Officer Robin Lavallee acted wrongfully with respect to their terminations. Stine asserts counterclaims against both Lavallee and Implicit; only Lavallee has moved to dismiss. Traver Stine also asserts counterclaims against both Lavallee and Implicit; both counter defendants have moved to dismiss her claims. I vacated the hearings on these motions because oral argument is unnecessary. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The motions to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.