IN RE LYFT, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20244:20-cv-09257California4,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In Re Lyft, Inc. Derivative Litigation Case No. 20-cv-09257-HSG

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

SETTLEMENT

10 Re: Dkt. No. 60

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the settlement reached in their consolidated shareholder derivative action. See Dkt. No. 60 (“Mot.”). The Court held a hearing on the motion on August 29, 2024. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Allegations This is a shareholder derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) against several Lyft officers and directors (collectively “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duty by failing, among other things, to: “(1) prevent or remediate the rampant sexual and physical assault committed by Lyft drivers against Lyft…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.