Michel

Michel v. Barroso

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20245:23-cv-06626California1,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAMON MICHEL, Case No. 23-cv-06626-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

v. AND OF SERVICE

J. BARROSO, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, fled this civil action against two officials at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) in Soledad, California –– Lieutenant J. Barroso and Sergeant J. Gomez. Following review of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court concluded Plaintiff’s retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims are, when liberally construed, capable of judicial determination, but as alleged, Plaintiff may not recover any monetary damages for mental or emotional distress incurred as a result of those claims. (ECF No. 10.) Therefore, Plaintiff received leave to file an amended complaint to cure this deficiency. The deadline to do so has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time do so, or shown…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.