Rubke

Rubke v. ServiceNow, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20243:24-cv-01050California4,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 PAUL S. RUBKE, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01050-TLT (PHK) Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY, GRANTING-IN-PART PLAINTIFFS' SERVICENOW, INC., et al., MOTION TO COMPEL, AND ISSUING

A PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants. Re: Dkt. 60 13 Now before the Court is a discovery dispute between class action Plaintiffs and Defendants, ServiceNow, Inc., and the Board of Directors of ServiceNow, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). [Dkt. 60]. Defendants seek to stay discovery and Plaintiffs seek to compel Defendants to produce limited discovery. After carefully considering all the briefing, the undersigned finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-1(b). As discussed herein, the undersigned DENIES Defendants’ request to stay discovery, GRANTS-IN-PART Plaintiffs’ request to compel Defendants to produce limited discovery, and ISSUES a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.