Jaiyeola
Jaiyeola v. Brundage
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:24-cv-03613-PCP
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS AND DENYING REQUEST
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
ROBERT A. BRUNDAGE, Re: Dkt. Nos. 29, 40 Defendant.
Defendant Robert Brundage moves to dismiss pro se plaintiff Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and therefore does not reach the question whether Jaiyeola has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. BACKGROUND The claims in this case derive from a product-liability action against Toyota and a co- defendant that Jaiyeola filed in Michigan state court in 2016, and which defendants thereafter removed to federal court. Jaiyeola v. Toyota Motor N. Am., Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00562-JTN-SJB (W.D. Mich. removed June 20, 2017).…