Bennett

Bennett v. Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20243:24-cv-06161California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAWN J. BENNETT, 92603-051, Case No. 24-cv-06161-CRB (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. (ECF Nos. 6 & 10) BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendant(s).

Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut (FCI Danbury) serving a 20-year sentence from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, has filed a pro se complaint against the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), FCI Danbury and various officials at both claiming improper denial of early release under the First Step Act (FSA), unlawful retaliation and denial of adequate medical care. Plaintiff also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 6), which based solely on her affidavit of poverty is GRANTED. A civil action in which a defendant is an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof acting in his official capacity or under color of legal authority, or an agency of the United States, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.