Garcia
Garcia v. Bradshaw
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN GARCIA, Case No. 24-cv-03068-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO
v. PLAINTIFF RE: STANDING
JAY BRADSHAW, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 59 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Juan Garcia alleges the defendant trust funds and trustees (collectively “Defendants”) violated ERISA by failing to accept trust fund contributions from his employer, AFI, after October 2023. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 69-70.) Defendants move to dismiss the claims on the grounds that, among other things, Plaintiff lacks Article III standing. (Dkt. No. 59 at 15-18.)1 Standing is a matter of a federal court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Renee v. Duncan, 686 F.3d 1002, 1012 (9th Cir. 2012). To demonstrate Article III standing, “[t]he plaintiff must have (1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330,…