Russell

Russell v. Siemens Industry Software Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20243:23-cv-03884California7,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY GORDON RUSSELL, Case No. 23-cv-03884-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. VACATE STAY AND WITHDRAW

FROM ARBITRATION

SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION The parties to this employment dispute previously stipulated to stay the case and proceed in arbitration before JAMS based on an arbitration agreement that Plaintiff Kelly Gordon Russell entered with a predecessor-in-interest to Defendant Siemens Industry Software Inc. (Siemens) in 2008. Russell now moves to vacate that stay and resume litigation in this Court under section 1281.98 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. This provision provides that a party that drafted an arbitration agreement materially breaches the agreement and defaults in arbitration if that party fails to pay arbitrators’ fees on a timely basis. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1281.98. The parties dispute the application of that law to the facts of this case, whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.