Koop

Koop v. Healthcare Markets, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20244:24-cv-05103California810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALE KOOP,

Case No. 24-cv-05103-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL

HEALTHCARE MARKETS, INC,

Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant.

Defendant and Counter-Claimant Healthcare Markets, Inc. (“HMI”) filed an administrative motion to file under seal the exhibits to its answer/counterclaim. [Docket Nos. 7 (Countercl.); 8 (MTS).] Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Dale Koop did not oppose. The court grants the motion to seal. In assessing whether documents may be filed under seal, there is “a strong presumption in favor of access.” Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). The Ninth Circuit established standards governing requests to seal in Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006). In accordance with the strong public policy favoring access to court records, “[a] party seeking to seal a judicial record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.