Kampe

Kampe v. Volta Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20244:22-cv-02055California10,078 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KAROLINE KAMPE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02055-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

VOLTA INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 112 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 112. The Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND Lead Plaintiff Steve Padget and additional plaintiffs Eric M. Walden and Jason Eckert (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action in which they assert, on their own behalf and on behalf of three proposed classes, claims against Volta and several of its officers, as well as Tortoise and several of its officers and directors (collectively, “Defendants”), under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act; Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. The claims are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.