In re Ripple Labs Inc. Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20244:18-cv-06753California5,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 In re RIPPLE LABS, INC. LITIGATION Case No. 18-cv-06753-PJH

7 This Document Relates To: ORDER RE DAUBERT MOTIONS 8 All Actions Re: Dkt. 318, 323, 327, 328

11 Before the court are four motions filed by the parties in the above-captioned case: (1) defendants’ motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff’s expert Jeremy Clark (Dkt. 327), (2) defendants’ motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff’s expert Saifedean Ammous (Dkt. 328), (3) plaintiff’s motion to exclude the testimony of defendants’ expert Alan Schwartz (Dkt. 318), and (4) defendants’ motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff’s expert Joel Seligman (Dkt. 323). Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and relevant authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND In this securities case, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which the court granted in part and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.