Steiner

Steiner v. Vi-Jon Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20243:23-cv-00473California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIELLE STEINER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00473-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

VI-JON INC, Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Vi-Jon, Inc.’s (“Vi-Jon”) motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order granting in part and denying in part Vi-Jon’s motion to dismiss. On October 24, 2024, the Court held a conference with the parties to discuss whether Vi- Jon’s proposed motion seeking reconsideration should be presented through a different procedural mechanism. The Court does not here summarize the entirety of the conversation, but the parties left the conference with directions to meet and confer regarding a briefing schedule on a narrowly focused motion for summary judgment from Vi-Jon. Upon further reflection, the Court finds that the proper procedural mechanism for the relief sought by Vi-Jon is a motion for judgment on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.