UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-03457-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER CONSTRUING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOTION CONNEX TCT LLC, et al., FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING MOTION Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Patton A. Carney has filed a “First Amended Complaint” in this matter and requested a referral to the Federal Pro Bono Project, despite the entry of judgment on October 15, 2024. See Dkt. 15. While Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his complaint after Defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted, the deadline for any such amendment was October 12, 2024. Therefore, his amendment is untimely and will be construed as a motion for reconsideration. Because Plaintiff has not shown any grounds for reconsideration, his motion is denied. Additionally, his request for the appointment of pro bono counsel and his motion to…