Sinclair

Sinclair v. Agile Web Studios

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20244:23-cv-02690California1,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUSTINE SINCLAIR, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02690-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO APPROVE

v. ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF

DEFENDANT VIA ELECTRONIC

AGILE WEB STUDIOS, et al., MAIL Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 138

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to alternatively serve Defendant Usman Khan via electronic service, Dkt. No. 138. The Court DENIES the motion without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Justine Sinclair and Dreamoway, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed their complaint in May 2023 alleging breach of contract, fraud, unfair competition, and other state law claims against several defendants. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 58–101. Plaintiffs are now seeking an order allowing for alternative service of process to be made upon one defendant, Usman Khan (“Defendant”), via electronic mail to three email addresses: mkhan@voipterminator.com,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.