McCullom

McCullom v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20244:23-cv-06553California2,712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN LEE MCCULLOM, Case No. 23-cv-06553-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at John Latoracca Correctional Center in Merced, California, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His amended complaint (ECF No. 9) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.