1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-06062-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX

9 v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE

TO SERVE A THIRD-PARTY

10 JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address SUBPOENA PRIOR TO RULE 26(F) 172.9.236.61, CONFERENCE 11 Defendant. 12 Docket No. 7

13 14 Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike 3”) has filed a copyright infringement action 15 against Defendant John Doe. Strike 3 alleges that Mr. Doe has infringed 24 of Strike 3’s motion 16 pictures using BitTorrent protocol. Docket No. 1 (Complaint) ¶ 4. Currently pending before the 17 Court is Strike 3’s ex parte application for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 18 26(f) conference. Docket No. 7. 19 I. DISCUSSION 20 The Court has reviewed the application and supporting materials, as well as the complaint. 21 See, e.g., Docket No. 7-1 Ex. A (Declaration of Jorge Arco) ¶¶ 34–36 (testifying that Strive 3 22 “strives to only file strong cases against extreme infringers . . . only those infringers who engage 23 not only in illegal downloading, but also in large scale unauthorised distribution of our content,” 24 “do[es] not seek settlements unless initiated by the defendant or their counsel,” “do[es] not send 25 demand letters,” and “are careful not to proceed with a case against a defendant unless we feel we 26 have a strong case and a good faith basis”); Docket No. 7-1 Ex. B (Declaration of Patrick Paige) 27 ¶¶ 16–18, 26 (testifying that upon reviewing the PCAP (packet capture), confirming that “the 1 UTC” that “uploaded a piece or pieces of a file corresponding to hash value 2 AD80D5F3B8D3C2EDCFECDEC4F88BB80A5CA8F385 to VXN Scan”); Docket No. 7-1 Ex. C 3 (Declaration of Susan Stalzer) ¶ 11 (testifying that each infringing file was a copy of one of Strike 4 3’s motion pictures that is “identical, strikingly similar, or substantially similar to the original 5 work”); Docket No. 7-1 Ex. D (Declaration of Emilie Kennedy) ¶¶ 4–8 (confirming that the IP 6 address 172.9.236.61 traced to a location in Dublin, California). 7 For reasons similar to those articulated in another Strike 3 case before the Court, see Strike 8 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, No. C-18-05994-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2018) (Docket No. 10), the 9 Court GRANTS the application for what is, in effect, limited early discovery. 10 The Court notes, however, that, although it is permitting limited early discovery, it is not 11 precluding Mr. Doe from filing a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss nor is it prejudging any such motion. 12 The Court also advises Strike 3 that, upon obtaining the name and address of Mr. Doe, it has a 13 Rule 11 obligation to determine whether to proceed with the lawsuit and, in that regard, it should 14 be mindful of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Gonzales, 901 F.3d 1142, 15 1144 (9th Cir. 2018) (stating that “a bare allegation that a defendant is the registered subscriber of 16 an Internet Protocol (‘IP’) address associated with infringing activity is [in]sufficient to state a 17 claim for direct or contributory infringement”). 18 II. CONCLUSION 19 It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff may immediately serve a Rule 45 subpoena on 20 AT&T Inc. (AT&T Internet) to obtain the true name and address of the Doe Defendant at IP 21 address 172.9.236.61. A copy of this Order must be attached to the subpoena, and any 22 information disclosed to Plaintiff in response to the subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for 23 the purpose of serving Defendant and prosecuting the claims asserted in the complaint. 24 It is further ORDERED that AT&T Internet will have 30 days from the date of service 25 upon it to serve the Doe Defendant with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this Order. 26 It is further ORDERED that the Doe Defendant will have 30 days from the date of service 27 upon him of this Order to file any motions contesting the subpoena with this Court. If that 30-day 1 the information responsive to the subpoena to Plaintiff within 10 days. 2 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not publicly disclose any of the Doe 3 || Defendant’s identifying information until he has had the opportunity to file a motion with this 4 || Court for leave to proceed anonymously and that motion is ruled on by the Court. The Doe 5 Defendant will have 30 days from the date of service upon him to file such a motion, and he may 6 || file the motion under seal. 7 This order disposes of Docket No. 7. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: October 28, 2024 g 12

EDWA®D M. CHEN

14 United States District Judge

16

17

Z 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28