Sands

Sands v. Midland National Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20244:23-cv-04680California5,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SANDS, Case No. 23-cv-04680-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO

STRIKE JURY DEMAND

MIDLAND NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 76, 77 11 Defendant. 12 This is an interpleader action that involves competing claims to two life insurance policies issued by Midland National Life Insurance Company (“Midland”) to Decedent Eric Baxley. Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Debbie Sands now moves for summary judgment on the interpleader action and to strike Norman’s jury demand. [Docket Nos. 76, 77.] Third-Party Defendant Daniel Norman opposes the motion for summary judgment but did not respond to the motion to strike. [Docket No. 79.] The court held a hearing on September 12, 2024 at which it granted the motion to strike the jury demand as unopposed. [Docket No. 83 (Minute Order).] For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment is granted. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.