Singh

Singh v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20244:24-cv-02009California1,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GURPREET SINGH, Case No. 24-cv-02009-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT

v.

GURKIRPAL SINGH, et al., Defendants.

Self-represented Plaintiff Gurpreet Singh filed a complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1, 3.] All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). [Docket Nos. 7, 13, 14.] On August 16, 2024, the court issued an order granting the IFP application and screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). [Docket No. 17 (Order).] The court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified in the screening order by September 6, 2024. Id. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. [Docket No. 18 (FAC).] As the court explained in its prior order, federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and a “federal court is presumed to lack jurisdiction in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.