Russo
Russo v. Omadi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WAYNE RUSSO, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02194-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS, OR IN ALTERNATIVE, TO
TRANSFER VENUE
OMADI INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer venue. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion, and TRANSFERS the case to the District of Utah. I. BACKGROUND On February 20, 2024, Plaintiffs Wayne Russo and Private Property Impound, Inc. (“PPI”) filed a complaint against Defendants Omadi Inc. and Traxero North America LLC in Alameda Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1-1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiffs allege that they launched an impound business in February 2016 to impound vehicles on…