Gustin
Gustin v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRANDON LEE GUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-02917-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
APPLICATION
v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 20. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court DENIES the application. I. BACKGROUND In May 2024, Plaintiff Brandon Gustin filed his complaint against Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at 3. According to Plaintiff, he and his wife signed a promissory note with IndyMac Bank for $338,000 in 2006 for their residential property located at 11 Benita Way in Martinez, California (“the Property”). Id. at 6. Plaintiff alleges that the Property “was wrongfully foreclosed and sold.” Dkt. No. 20 at 4. Plaintiff’s…