Translarity, Inc. v. Grand Junction Semiconductor Pte. Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20243:24-cv-02423California7,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRANSLARITY, INC., Case No. 24-cv-02423-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

GRAND JUNCTION SEMICONDUCTOR STAYING REMAINING PTE. LTD., et al., PROCEEDINGS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 51-53, 67 12 On October 25, 2024, the Court held a hearing on several motions filed by defendants Grand Junction Semiconductor PTE, Ltd., Pacific Gate Advisors LLC, Robert Marassa and Huan Wang, as well as Translarity’s motion to strike paragraphs 16-18 of Robert Marassa’s reply declaration. The Court construes defendants’ motion to dismiss for improper venue as a motion to compel arbitration, and so construed, the Court GRANTS the motion as follows: Translarity, Grand Junction, Robert Marassa and Huan Wang (in their capacities as agents for Grand Junction) are compelled to engage in arbitration pursuant to the arbitration agreement. The balance of the case is STAYED pending arbitration.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.