Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Inspur Group Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20244:24-cv-02220California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE Case No. 24-cv-02220-JST

COMPANY,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUESTS FOR STAY OF DISCOVERY v. Re: ECF Nos. 105, 107 INSPUR GROUP CO., LTD., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court are joint discovery dispute letters regarding whether Defendants Kaytus Singapore PTE. Ltd. and Inspur Group Co. Ltd. must participate in discovery pending resolution of their motions to dismiss. ECF Nos. 105, 107. For the reasons explained below, the Court will stay discovery as to these Defendants pending resolution of their motions to dismiss. “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery when a potentially dispositive motion is pending.” Serenium, Inc. v. Zhou, No. 20-CV- 02132-BLF (NC), 2021 WL 7541379, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2021) (quoting In re Nexus 6p Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 17-cv-02185-BLF, 2017 WL 3581188, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2017)).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.