Great American Insurance Company v. Vasquez Marshall Architects

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20193:19-cv-01173California2,824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE Case No.: 19-CV-1173-CAB-NLS

COMPANY,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff, MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND v. DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

VASQUEZ MARSHALL ARCHITECTS

AMEND et al.,

16 Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 16, 17]

18 Before the Court are Defendant Vasquez Marshall Architects’ and Defendant BDS Engineering, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint based on identical grounds. [Doc. Nos. 16, 17.] Plaintiff filed a consolidated opposition to both motions [Doc. No. 19], and Defendants replied. [Doc. Nos. 20, 21.] The Court deems them suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motions to dismiss with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Great American…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.