Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20193:17-cv-01436California13,446 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP; and Case No.: 3:17-cv-01436-GPC-MDD

FRANCISCO AGUILAR, MILO

BARLEY, GLORIA COSTA, GEORGE ORDER:

DECROSE, SALLY DECORSE, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others (1) GRANTING ROSETTE 14 similarly situated, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH Plaintiff,

AND FIFTH CLAIMS;

16 v. (2) GRANTING ROSETTE

QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION;

STRIKE

ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE &

ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP;

[ECF No. 185] RICHARD ARMSTRONG; KEENY

ESCALANTI, SR.; MARK WILLIAM

21 WHITE II, a/k/a WILLIE WHITE; and

DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Defendant. 24 25 26 27 This case involves a dispute between Williams & Cochrane, LLP (W&C) and the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation (Quechan”), a former W&C client, over attorney fees that W&C claims it is owed for their work renegotiating a gambling 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.