Bishop

Bishop v. Boral Industries, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20193:18-cv-02701California7,071 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FILED

SEP 09 2019

err 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |) RYAN BISHOP, on behalf of himself and Case No.: 3:18-cv-02701-BEN-MSB all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,| ORDER:

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS?

California Corporation, BORAL MOTION TO DISMISS }} ROOFING, LLC, a Delaware Limited PLAINTIFE’S COMPLAINT; and Liability Corporation, and DOES 1-10, (2) GRANTING IN PART AND Defendants.| DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE

19 [Doc. 4] Before the Court is Defendants Boral Industries, Inc. (“Boral Inc.”), and Boral ||Roofing, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation (“Boral LLC”) (collectively ||“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff Ryan Bishop’s (“Bishop” or |\“Plaintiff’) Complaint. (See Doc. No. 4.) The Court finds the matter appropriate for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.