Augustine

Augustine v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20203:19-cv-00826California5,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

] . 2 3 . 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} EDNA A., Case No.: 3:19-cv-826-BEN-RBM Plaintiff,

ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF

13 || V. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 14 |} ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER SECURITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. [Docs. 14, 15] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Edna A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking ||judicial review of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) Commissioner’s ||(“Defendant” or “Commissioner”)! final decision denying Plaintiffs disability insurance 22 || benefits application under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). (Doc. 1.) There are two briefs before the Court: (1) Plaintiff's Merits Brief (“Merits Brief”),” ||seeking remand and a direct award of benefits, or …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.