Flowrider Surf, Ltd. v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:15-cv-01879California6,312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOWRIDER SURF, LTD., a Canadian Case No.: 3:15-cv-01879-BEN-BLM corporation; and SURF WAVES, LTD., a 12 company incorporated in the United ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Kingdom, (1) EX PARTE MOTION FOR Plaintiffs,

LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY

v. TO DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S

PACIFIC SURF DESIGNS, INC., a

RENEWED MOTION FOR

Delaware corporation, ATTORNEY’S FEES Defendant. 18 (2) MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS 19 [ECF No. 294, 296]

21 Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ (1) Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File a 22 Sur-Reply to Defendant’s Reply in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, 23 ECF No. 294, and (2) Motion to Re-tax Costs, ECF No. 296. The Court DENIES 24 Plaintiffs’ (1) Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Defendant’s Reply in 25 Support of Their Renewed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees as moot, and (2) Motion to Re-tax 26 Costs. 27 On August 24, 2015, Plaintiffs commenced this patent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.