Winet
Winet v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RICHARD WINET, Case No.: 20cv14 W (BGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY
v. DISPUTES
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO., [ECF 39-40] Defendant. 14 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Richard Winet and Defendant Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (“Gallagher”) raised discovery disputes regarding numerous requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) and two interrogatories (“ROGs”) from Plaintiff to Gallagher. (ECF 35.) The Courted order the parties to submit a joint statement addressing the specific issues in dispute. (ECF 36.) Further, the parties were ordered to “address the relevancy of the discovery sought and whether the discovery sought is ‘proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the…