Alzner

Alzner v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20233:16-cv-00333California1,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE PORTFOLIO RECOVERY Case No.: 11md02295 JAH-BGS

ASSOCIATES, LLC, TELEPHONE

12 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT Member cases: LITIGATION All member cases

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DENYING

DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO

EXCLUDE AS MOOT [Doc. Nos. 673, 850, 885]

Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 850) and motions to exclude (Doc. Nos. 673, 885). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendant’s motions to exclude as moot. DISCUSSION I. Motion for Summary Judgment A. Legal Standard Summary judgment is properly granted when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” FED.R.CIV.P. 56(a). Entry of summary judgment is appropriate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.