Greenwood

Greenwood v. Palomar Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20213:19-cv-01686California1,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 GARY GREENWOOD, Case No. 3:19-cv-1686-LAB-MSB 12 Plaintiff,

13 vs. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY PALOMAR HEALTH, et al., JUDGMENT WITHOUT Defendants. PREJUDICE AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE RE: JURISDICTION [Dkt. 28]

Plaintiff Gary Greenwood brought this action against his former employer, Defendant Palomar Health, asserting one federal claim for wrongful denial of leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and six claims under California state law: denial of leave under the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA” claim); racial harassment; failure to prevent racial harassment; retaliation for reporting harassment; discrimination based on race; and retaliation for disclosing a violation of law. Palomar moved for summary judgment on each claim. (Dkt. 28.) But only one of Greenwood’s state law claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.