Mahil

Mahil v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20223:20-cv-01559California12,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARJIT MAHIL, an individual, ) Case No.: 3:20-cv-01559-BEN-MDD ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER: v. ) ) (1) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR OPTION CARE ENTERPRISES, INC., a ) PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Delaware corporation, ) IS DENIED; and Defendant. ) ) (2) THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS TO ) FILE UNDER SEAL ARE GRANTED ) ) ) [ECF Nos. 36, 37, 45] 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Harjit Mahil (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendant Option Care Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendant”) for various violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (the “FMLA”), California’s Family Rights Act (“CFRA”), and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). ECF No. 1. Before the Court is: (1) Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.