De La Rosa v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20223:21-cv-01630California7,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTHA DEA LA ROSA, an individual, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1630-W-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

COSTCO WHOLESALE

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR

CORPORATION, a Washington SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OR, IN Corporation; and DOES 1 through 25,

THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL

inclusive,

SUMMARY JUDGEMENT [DOC. 18]

Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation’s motion for summary judgement or, in the alternative, partial summary judgement. [Doc. 18.] The Court decides the motions on the papers, and without oral argument. See Civ.L.R. 7.1.d.1. For the reasons that follow, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion [Doc. 18]. 24 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. De La Rosa’s Beginning of Employment at Costco De La Rosa began her employment with Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.