Newsom

Abiding Place Ministries v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20233:21-cv-00518California5,234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABIDING PLACE MINISTRIES, a Case No.: 3:21-cv-00518-RBM-DDL Church,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART STATE v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS

GAVIN NEWSOM, in his individual 15 capacity; et al.,

16 Defendants. [Doc. 21]

18 On May 28, 2021, Plaintiff Abiding Place Ministries (“Plaintiff”) filed their First 19 Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) (“FAC”), naming Gavin Newsom, Xavier Becerra, Sonia 20 Y. Angell, Wilma J. Wooten, County of San Diego (“County”), and Does 1 through 100 21 as defendants. Aside from the County, all Defendants1 have been named in their individual 22

24 1 The Court notes that the header of each cause of action within the FAC contains a 25 parenthetical that each claim is directed “Against All Defendants In Their Individual Capacity Only.” (FAC at 14-20.) Although the header omits reference to the County, the Court will construe this omission as an error in light of the Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.