Greenley

Greenley v. Kochava, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20233:22-cv-01327California12,399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID GREENLEY, Case No. 22-cv-01327-BAS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. GRANTING IN PART AND KOCHAVA, INC.,

DENYING IN PART

Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 11); AND

2. DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR VENUE

18 TRANSFER (ECF No. 21) 19 20 Pending before the Court are two motions. First, Defendant moves to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1), asserting a lack of standing, and Rule 12(b)(6), asserting a failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (MTD, ECF No. 11.) Second, Defendant moves to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (Mot. Venue, ECF No. 21.) Having considered the parties’ filings, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) and DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Venue Transfer (ECF No. 21). 28 BACKGROUND I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.