Greenley
Greenley v. Kochava, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID GREENLEY, Case No. 22-cv-01327-BAS-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. 1. GRANTING IN PART AND KOCHAVA, INC.,
DENYING IN PART
Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 11); AND
2. DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR VENUE
18 TRANSFER (ECF No. 21) 19 20 Pending before the Court are two motions. First, Defendant moves to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1), asserting a lack of standing, and Rule 12(b)(6), asserting a failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (MTD, ECF No. 11.) Second, Defendant moves to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (Mot. Venue, ECF No. 21.) Having considered the parties’ filings, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) and DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Venue Transfer (ECF No. 21). 28 BACKGROUND I. …