Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20233:18-cv-00840California11,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORIES, LP Case No.: 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS

LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A

MATTER OF LAW

[ECF No. 438] 16 Before the Court is Defendant Tauler Smith LLP’s1 Renewed Motion for Judgment 17 as a Matter of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). ECF No. 438. 18 Plaintiffs Roma Minkha, Inc., doing business as Bobar #2 Liquor; NMRM, Inc., doing 19 business as Sunset Liquor; and Skyline Market Inc., doing business as Skyline Farms 20 Market (collectively “The Stores”) filed an opposition to Tauler Smith’s motion, ECF 21 No. 440, and Tauler Smith has filed a reply, ECF No. 441. Pursuant to Civil Local

23 1 Although Tauler Smith was brought into the proceedings as a third-party defendant and counter-defendant, see ECF No. 114 (operative Second Amended Counterclaims and 25 Third-Party Claims), for convenience and clarity the Court adopts the parties’ nomenclature, see ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.