Windy Cove, Inc. v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINDY COVE, INC. et al., Case No. 21-cv-1416-MMA-DEB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES;
AND
CIRCLE K STORES, INC.,
Defendant. [Doc. No. 193]
GRANTING MOTION TO RE-TAX
COSTS
18 [Doc. No. 206] 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees and motion to re-tax costs. See Doc. Nos. 193, 206. Plaintiffs1 oppose both motions. See Doc. Nos. 207, 211. The Court found these matters suitable for determination on the papers 25 26 1 For the sake of convenience, the Court refers to Windy Cove, Inc., Staffing and Management Group, Inc. d/b/a Kazmo, LLC, HB Fuel, Inc., Mohammad Bahour, and Hamid Kahour collectively as 28 and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to retax costs and…