Windy Cove, Inc. v. Circle K Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20243:21-cv-01416California10,869 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINDY COVE, INC. et al., Case No. 21-cv-1416-MMA-DEB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES;

AND

CIRCLE K STORES, INC.,

Defendant. [Doc. No. 193]

GRANTING MOTION TO RE-TAX

COSTS

18 [Doc. No. 206] 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees and motion to re-tax costs. See Doc. Nos. 193, 206. Plaintiffs1 oppose both motions. See Doc. Nos. 207, 211. The Court found these matters suitable for determination on the papers 25 26 1 For the sake of convenience, the Court refers to Windy Cove, Inc., Staffing and Management Group, Inc. d/b/a Kazmo, LLC, HB Fuel, Inc., Mohammad Bahour, and Hamid Kahour collectively as 28 and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to retax costs and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.