Anthony

Anthony v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20243:23-cv-00960California1,931 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PIERRE ANTHONY, Case No.: 23cv960-LL-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

GREYSTAR REAL ESTATE [ECF No. 4] PARTNERS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Pierre Anthony (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, filed a 18 Complaint against Defendants Greystar Real Estate Partners, Lofts 677 HoldCo, LLC, and 19 Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 1. On June 23, 2023, 20 the Court issued an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and 21 Dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 22 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). ECF No. 3, Order. In the Order, the Court provided Plaintiff leave 23 to file an amended complaint. Id. at 6. On July 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended 24 complaint. ECF No. 4, Amended Complaint (“Amended Compl.”). 25 For the following reasons, upon the Court’s screening of the Amended Complaint 26 pursuant …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.