Borrello
Borrello v. Respironics California, LLC (P)
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20243:23-cv-00580California14,095 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE BORRELLO, Case No.: 23-cv-580-GPC-VET
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS
RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, LLC;
RESPIRONICS NOVAMETRIX, LLC;
[ECF No. 26]
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC;
PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC;
PHILIPS DS NORTH AMERICA LLC;
PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC.; VITOR
ROCHA, Defendants. 20 Before the Court is the second motion to dismiss Plaintiff Mike Borrello’s amended complaint (“AC”), ECF No. 22, by Defendants Respironics California, LLC; Respironics Novametrix, LLC; Philips North America LLC; Philips RS North America LLC; Philips DS North America LLC; Philips Holding USA Inc; and Vitor Rocha (collectively “Defendants”), ECF No. 26. Defendants move to dismiss the AC in its entirety for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of 27 Civil Procedure (“Rule”)…