Borrello

Borrello v. Respironics California, LLC (P)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20243:23-cv-00580California14,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE BORRELLO, Case No.: 23-cv-580-GPC-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, LLC;

RESPIRONICS NOVAMETRIX, LLC;

[ECF No. 26]

PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC;

PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC;

PHILIPS DS NORTH AMERICA LLC;

PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC.; VITOR

ROCHA, Defendants. 20 Before the Court is the second motion to dismiss Plaintiff Mike Borrello’s amended complaint (“AC”), ECF No. 22, by Defendants Respironics California, LLC; Respironics Novametrix, LLC; Philips North America LLC; Philips RS North America LLC; Philips DS North America LLC; Philips Holding USA Inc; and Vitor Rocha (collectively “Defendants”), ECF No. 26. Defendants move to dismiss the AC in its entirety for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of 27 Civil Procedure (“Rule”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.