Morgan
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual; Case No.: 20-cv-574-GPC-AHG MICHAEL BEVAN, an individual; 12 individually, and on behalf of others ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND similarly situated, DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES’
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Plaintiffs,
v. [ECF Nos. 249–253, 255–263] ROHR, INC., a corporation; HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND, d/b/a UTC
AEROSPACE
SYSTEMS d/b/a COLLINS
AEROSPACE; UNITED
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
20 Defendants.
22 Pending before the Court were fourteen motions in limine. A hearing was held on 23 May 16, 2024. There, the Court issued a tentative ruling on each motion and provided 24 the parties with the opportunity to orally respond. A final ruling was then made on every 25 motion but Defendants’ MIL No. 2 and Plaintiffs’ MIL No. 1, which were taken under 26 27 submission. This order repeats those rulings and provides the Court’s decision on Defendants’ MIL No. 2 and Plaintiffs’ MIL No. 1. 1. DEFENDANTS’ MIL NO. 1…