Bratt

Bratt v. Dooley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20243:23-cv-02336California1,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRYAN MARSHALL BRATT, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02336-RBM-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING CASE RACHEL MAW DOOLEY,

Defendant. (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK’S

ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS MOOT

18 [Docs. 3, 4, 14]

On December 26, 2023, Plaintiff Bryan Marshall Bratt (“Plaintiff”) filed his “Complaint for Excessive and Unessary (sic) Emotional, Professional and Personal Damages” (“Complaint”) against Defendant Rachel Maw Dooley (“Defendant”). (Doc. 1.) In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges the following: Over the course of my professional career with Rachel Dooley, I believe she is blaming me for a situation she created herself. I have sought to mediate 26 which she has denied. She has gotten me kicked out of multiple events. She has gotten, in my opinion, an unfair cease and desist order from the police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.