Bonilla

Bonilla v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20243:24-cv-00699California1,211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:24-cv-0699-JES-AHG

STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA,

CDCR #J-48500 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff,

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

14 v. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

16 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF [ECF No. 2] CALIFORNIA, Defendants. 19 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at the California Medical Facility, has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. For the reasons discussed below, the IFP motion is denied and the case is dismissed. I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405, consisting of a $350…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.