Lover-El

Lover-El v. Kroger Food 4 Less

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20243:24-cv-00377California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EL’ESTRO LOVER-EL, Case No.: 24-CV-377-CAB-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

KROGER FOOD 4 LESS,

Defendant. [Doc. No. 5] 11 12 This matter is before the Court on a motion for judgment on the pleadings by Defendant Kroger Food Less on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint fails to state a claim. The motion was filed on April 8, 2024, and set a hearing date (for briefing purposes only) of May 13, 2024. Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2 requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition or statement of non- opposition no later than fourteen calendar days before the noticed hearing. Thus, based on the hearing date of May 13, 2024, Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was due on April 29, 2024. When no opposition was filed by that deadline, and because Plaintiff is pro se and may have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.