Hammerlord

Hammerlord v. Elliott

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20243:23-cv-00663California955 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 M. NORMAN HAMMERLORD, Case No.: 23-cv-00663-JO-KSC

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

REOPEN THE TIME TO FILE AN

MARA W. ELLIOTT, San Diego City

APPEAL

Attorney and TODD GLORIA, San Diego 15 City Mayor, 16 Defendants. 17 18

Pro se Plaintiff Hammerlord requests to reopen the time to file an appeal. Dkt. 11. On April 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkts. 1,2. On June 9, 2023, pursuant to screening obligations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice. Dkt. 3. Following this order, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration [Dkt. 4], which the Court denied on August 8, 2023 [Dkt. 5]. Following the Court’s orders, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint [Dkt. 6] and motion of readiness to proceed [Dkt. 7]. On January 4, 2024, the Court issued a minute order informing Plaintiff that it had already ordered a final…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.